● RADIOAdvertise with us
DOWNUNDERVOICESAustralia · New Zealand · World
Back to Australia
Australia

4 September 2026

Six steps to beat One Nation and restore public trust - The Australian

Downunder Voices Newsroom

Six steps to beat One Nation and restore public trust - The Australian

Six steps to beat One Nation and restore public trust The Australian

About this report

This article contains independently written commentary and community perspective from Downunder Voices.

Join our community

Follow Downunder Voices

Join thousands of readers following news and community stories from Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific.

More from Australia

View category

Read Next

View latest

5 September 2026

Backing Pasifika rangatahi: promise, partnership — and the hard work ahead

New opportunities are being promised for Pasifika young people across New Zealand through a government partnership intended to help rangatahi gain practical skills, explore future careers and build employment pathways. Youth Minister James Meager and Pacific Peoples Minister Paul Goldsmith have announced the initiative with those clear aims. It is the kind of targeted effort that can make a real difference — provided it is followed through with long‑term commitment and co‑design with the communities it seeks to serve. Pasifika communities are among the fastest growing and youngest in Aotearoa. That demographic vitality is an asset if harnessed well: with the right skills and opportunities, Pasifika rangatahi can drive innovation, fill labour shortages and contribute to strong local economies. Programmes that connect training with genuine career pathways — not simply short courses without clear employer uptake — are more likely to produce sustained results. The announcement is welcome for a simple reason: government action matters. When ministers put resources and attention behind youth training and employment, it creates momentum. But the record of such initiatives is mixed; success depends on design, scale and how programmes are delivered on the ground. Too many well‑meaning schemes have faltered because they were rolled out without meaningful engagement with the communities they intended to help, or because funding dried up once initial targets were met. That is why co‑design must be more than a slogan. Pasifika leaders, employers and youth themselves should be partners in shaping what skills are taught, how credentials are recognised by industry, and which employers commit to taking on trainees. Practical placements, apprenticeships and mentorships are where classroom learning meets the real world of work. Without those connections, even well‑resourced courses risk leaving young people qualified but unemployed. Another key test will be geographic reach. Pasifika communities are concentrated in some urban centres but are also dispersed in provincial towns. Programmes that are city‑centric risk leaving rural and outer‑suburban rangatahi behind. Delivering training in community settings, funding transport and providing wraparound supports — childcare, cultural mentoring, flexible study hours — will increase the chances that young people can take part and succeed. Finally, the partnership must be judged by outcomes, not promises: are more Pasifika young people in decent jobs? Are they progressing in their careers? Are employers reporting real skills gains and retention? Ministers Meager and Goldsmith have set the right direction; the rest is in the doing. If this initiative becomes another short burst of attention, communities will be disappointed. If it becomes a durable platform for skills, careers and leadership, it will be a turning point. Pasifika rangatahi carry the future of Aotearoa in their hands. Policy that respects their aspirations, invests in practical pathways and treats community leaders as partners — not just beneficiaries — has the best chance of turning promise into lasting progress.

Community angle

Highlights how the partnership can directly improve Pasifika youth employment and wellbeing if it includes genuine co‑design, local delivery and employer links.

Source: Beehive Government ReleasesOriginal source

5 September 2026

Beetaloo gas is flowing — but Australians need a clearer ledger of the costs and gains

The Northern Territory has reached a milestone: gas from the Beetaloo Sub‑Basin is now flowing. For the NT government, the moment was framed as a political triumph — a declaration they “stared down the hypocrites” to get resources moving. For households, regional communities and the nation, the arrival of Beetaloo’s gas is the start of a longer conversation, not the end. That conversation should begin with a simple question: what does this actually mean for ordinary Australians? Proponents argue that new domestic gas supplies can stabilise energy markets, supply industry and keep lights on as older coal units retire. Opponents warn that unlocking more fossil fuel production at a time of acute climate pressure risks locking in emissions and undermining investment in cleaner alternatives. Both points have merit, and both deserve to be assessed openly. The Beetaloo project promises jobs and economic activity at a time when regional development is urgently needed. For Territorians, new major projects can translate into local employment, contracts for small businesses and an expanded tax base. The political capital invested in bringing Beetaloo online reflects that reality: governments believe resources drive growth, particularly in places with limited economic options. But the promise is not the same as the outcome. The ABC’s analysis asks the right follow‑up: will Beetaloo be the economic game changer it has been billed as? That depends on market demand, the terms of royalties and taxes, the scale of local participation, and how long the development is allowed to run. If most of the benefits leak to distant companies or if the project delivers a short boom followed by a bust, the region could end up with environmental consequences and less to show for them than imagined. The environmental argument is immediate and real. Australia has committed to emissions reductions; voters and businesses alike are planning around a future that requires a lot more clean energy. Approving a major new gas play now risks delaying the investments — in transmission, storage, and renewables integration — that a transitioning economy urgently needs. It is also understandable that some see any new fossil fuel development as a step backwards. That tension is not insoluble. The questions the public should demand answers to are practical and specific: how will royalties and taxes be structured to ensure local benefit? What guarantees are in place for jobs, training and procurement for local businesses? How will environmental impacts be monitored and managed? Crucially, how will any gas production be reconciled with national emissions commitments and the drive to more renewables and storage? Politicians who celebrate Beetaloo’s first gas must accept that celebration does not substitute for accountability. If this project is to be more than a photo opportunity, its terms must be transparent and the gains demonstrable to Northern Territorians and to taxpayers across the country. Australians are waking up to the hard truth: energy security and climate responsibility cannot be pitted against one another as if one negates the need for the other. We need both a reliable supply of energy and a credible path to lower emissions. That requires hard, honest choices — and a ledger that shows who pays, who gains and what the long‑term costs will be. Beetaloo’s first flow is a milestone. The proper test will be whether it is managed in a way that leaves the Territory and the nation better off — not just in the short term, but for decades to come.

Community angle

This editorial stresses the need for transparency on jobs, royalties and environmental monitoring so Northern Territory communities see tangible benefits and protections from the Beetaloo development.

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/feed/45910/rss.xmlOriginal source