● RADIOAdvertise with us
DOWNUNDERVOICESAustralia · New Zealand · World
Back to Australia
Australia

13 September 2026

Fugitive property developer Jean Nassif to front NSW ICAC from Lebanon

Downunder Voices Newsroom

Source reporting: abc.net.au

FacebookEmail
Fugitive property developer Jean Nassif to front NSW ICAC from Lebanon

Jean Nassif is expected to front the NSW corruption watchdog this afternoon, after cancelling an earlier scheduled appearance on medical grounds.

About this report

Downunder Voices provides an independently written summary and community perspective based on information published by the original source. The original publisher remains responsible for its reporting.

Join our community

Follow Downunder Voices

Join thousands of readers following news and community stories from Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific.

Follow on FacebookSubmit your story

More from Australia

View category
Queensland woman falls to her death at Bali cliff popular with touristsAustralia

14 September 2026

Queensland woman falls to her death at Bali cliff popular with tourists

Twenty-nine-year-old Queenslander was visiting Kelingking beach on a holiday, Nusa Penida police say The death of an Australian woman in a cliff fall at a popular Bali tourist destination has been described as “incredibly sad”. Police say the 29-year-old Queenslander was found stuck on the side of Kelingking beach cliff on Saturday morning, local time. Emergency services rushed to the scene but she fell further before they could reach her.

Source: The Guardian WorldOriginal source

Read Next

View latest
When schools juggle duty of care, too many survivors are left to copeSocial Issues

14 September 2026

When schools juggle duty of care, too many survivors are left to cope

The terrible facts emerging from recent cases — a rise in peer‑on‑peer sexual violence, the death of a 16‑year‑old from suspected sexual choking, and students returning to class while their assaults are investigated — demand more than headlines. They beg the question: what duty do schools owe to victims, and what do we expect of institutions that must also balance due process for accused students? The national cabinet’s decision to prioritise a plan to end sexual violence against women, state moves in New South Wales and the federal government’s draft digital duty of care legislation are welcome steps, but policy must translate into safer everyday classrooms. For a student preparing to sit HSC exams while at the centre of an alleged gang‑rape, the immediate concern is practical: how to study when safety, privacy and trauma are unresolved. For parents and teachers, the question is how schools can remain places of learning and refuge when the social dynamics that underpin schooling change so rapidly. The spike in peer‑on‑peer violence indicates this is not a series of isolated problems; it is a systemic issue spanning school culture, supervision, digital spaces and the intersection of adolescence with broader social behaviours. A duty of care cannot mean merely a checklist of punishment or exclusion. Schools must be capable of holding the safety of survivors at the centre of a response that includes immediate protection, ongoing pastoral support and adjustments to learning arrangements so students can continue their education without retraumatisation. At the same time, institutions must preserve procedural fairness for those accused; hasty expulsions without proper investigation can do profound harm and may entrench injustice. This balancing act requires better resourcing and clearer protocols. Teachers and school leaders are already stretched; asking them to carry the full burden of responding to serious allegations without specialist support is unfair and ineffective. Schools need access to trained counsellors, trauma‑informed professionals and prompt pathways to police and child protection services where warranted. Education departments should ensure consistent policies across jurisdictions so families know what to expect regardless of postcode. Digital spaces complicate matters. The federal draft on a digital duty of care recognises that online behaviour fuels and amplifies harm, but legislation is only one piece. Schools must be equipped to work with families and platforms to remove harmful material swiftly, protect privacy and educate young people about consent and digital citizenship. Prevention matters as much as response. Comprehensive, age‑appropriate education about consent and respectful relationships should be universal and evidence‑based, taught with cultural competency and continuity across years. Parents, too, must be part of the conversation: schools cannot substitute for community standards. Ultimately, the measure of our schools will not be the speed of their punishments but the quality of their protections. Students forced to ‘‘go back the next day and just deal with it’’ should not be part of any system’s normal operating procedures. If national and state initiatives are to mean anything, they must fund support, tighten protocols and change school cultures so young people can learn without fear. Anything less leaves survivors to shoulder a burden no child should bear.

Community angle

Ordinary families need to know that schools can protect students and support learning after an assault. Parents want clear, consistent protocols and funded support services so children aren’t retraumatised.

Source: Guardian Australia PoliticsOriginal source
Tasmania’s kingfish trial tests promise and prudence in Bass StraitSocial Issues

14 September 2026

Tasmania’s kingfish trial tests promise and prudence in Bass Strait

Tasmania has quietly entered a new chapter in its long relationship with the sea. About 15,000 yellowtail kingfish have just arrived to be raised off the Tasmanian coast for an offshore farming trial in Bass Strait — the first attempt to grow this species in Commonwealth waters. On the surface, it is an encouraging sign: a regional economy seizing an opportunity to diversify, create jobs and add value to Australia’s seafood exports. But the trial also forces the hard questions about how we expand aquaculture without repeating past mistakes. For Tasmanians, aquaculture is not theoretical. It is a major employer and a source of identity for coastal communities. An offshore kingfish trial adds a new option to the industry’s repertoire, one that could broaden seasonal work, attract investment and help regional towns that have few other growth levers. The lion’s share of the country’s seafood consumption is met by wild catch and established aquaculture species; developing new, higher‑value farmed species could improve resilience to international market shocks and offer consumers fresh domestic options. Yet the move into Commonwealth waters — beyond state marine jurisdictions — raises the stakes. Offshore farming can deliver economies of scale and reduce some nearshore environmental pressures, but it also brings novel governance, biosecurity and environmental monitoring challenges. Commonwealth oversight should not be an argument for lowered scrutiny; if anything, operating at that scale demands stronger, visible regulation and independent science-backed monitoring so communities can have confidence in both the industry and its custodians. Environmental impacts are not abstract. Farming carnivorous species like yellowtail kingfish can introduce feed and nutrient flows that affect seabed ecology, wild fish stocks and water quality if not tightly managed. The trial must therefore be designed to test not just growth rates and profitability but ecological footprints, escape risks and disease controls. Transparent baseline studies and ongoing public reporting will be essential to determine whether a commercial roll‑out is prudent. Equally important is the social licence of new aquaculture operations. Coastal communities have been burned before by projects that promised jobs but left environmental or amenity costs. Developers and government agencies must engage early and meaningfully with local fishers, recreational users and Aboriginal communities, whose relationship with the marine environment is longstanding. If the trial falters on trust, the best scientific outcomes will count for little. Policy design should also ensure benefits are kept local where feasible: supply chains for feed, processing and cold storage present opportunities for regional business growth. Training and pathways for local workers — including women and First Nations people — will determine whether the trial is an exercise in extractive investment or a genuine regional development opportunity. Trials are about learning. The arrival of those 15,000 kingfish is the start of a measured experiment; how governments, researchers, industry and communities choose to frame and police it will decide whether it becomes a model for sustainable expansion or a cautionary tale. Tasmania’s coasts and communities deserve both economic opportunity and ongoing stewardship of the marine environment. Done right, the Bass Strait trial could provide both. Done badly, it will only prove that a bigger ocean does not absolve us of responsibility for the smallest of our decisions.

Community angle

This trial affects coastal jobs, local fisheries, and the quality of surrounding waters. Residents should expect clear monitoring, local engagement and visible benefits to the region if offshore aquaculture proceeds.

Source: https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=Australia&qft=sortbydate%3d%221%22&format=rssOriginal source