9 September 2026
‘Lying cowards’: Scathing reply to ‘traitor’ slur News. com. au
This article contains independently written commentary and community perspective from Downunder Voices.
Join our community
Join thousands of readers following news and community stories from Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific.
9 September 2026
New research reveals how the visa someone arrives on shapes whether their first ten years are secure or spent in poverty.
9 September 2026
‘Lying cowards’: War erupts over cartoon News. com. au
9 September 2026
Reports that the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission — an agency that has access to NDIA data — used Palantir software as part of a multi‑agency fraud taskforce raise fundamental questions about trust, oversight and the treatment of people with disability. The National Disability Insurance Scheme was established to give participants dignity, choice and control; anything that risks confidential personal information being handed to opaque commercial analytics platforms deserves public scrutiny. Palantir is no ordinary vendor. Since May there have been calls to ban the company’s software from Australian government use after a manifesto circulated by its founder was said to imply some cultures were inferior to others. A UK MP described those writings as the “ramblings of a supervillain.” Those controversies make the software’s use in relation to NDIA data especially sensitive: we are not talking about generic administrative information, but records tied to people who depend on supports to live and participate in the community. Governments have a legitimate obligation to tackle fraud. Fraud against welfare and insurance schemes can harm public confidence, divert resources and reduce support for people who need services. Multi‑agency taskforces that pool information can be effective at detecting organised fraud rings and recovering public money. But effectiveness must be balanced against privacy, proportionality and the rights of individuals. The ACIC’s use of Palantir as part of a taskforce prompts hard questions: what specific NDIA data were used, on what legal basis, and under what safeguards? Were participants and providers informed? What retention and access controls apply? And crucially, what independent oversight exists to ensure analytics aren’t used in ways that unfairly profile or penalise people already living with disadvantage? Public trust in the NDIS is fragile. Reports of misuse or opaque handling of data will amplify scepticism among participants, families and providers. That scepticism has consequences: people may withhold information, disengage from services, or face stigma based on analytics-driven conclusions. For vulnerable Australians, the risks are not abstract — they can mean the loss of essential supports. There are practical ways forward that respect both the need to counter fraud and the rights of participants. First, any use of sensitive NDIA data by external analytics platforms must be transparent and clearly justified. Second, legal and contractual safeguards should be published, including data minimisation, purpose limitation and strict access logs. Third, independent oversight — by the privacy commissioner or parliamentary committees — must be exercised before, during and after deployments of such tools. The public debate about Palantir is not merely about a company’s reputation. It is about whether government can use powerful technology responsibly when the stakes are people’s lives and livelihoods. Australians who rely on the NDIS deserve both robust fraud prevention and ironclad protections for their personal information. If those aims are in tension, the burden must fall on governments to demonstrate, with facts and oversight, that they can be reconciled. Anything less will erode trust in one of the nation’s most important social programs.
Community angle
Frames the NDIS-Palantir issue around trust for people with disability and local communities, urging transparent safeguards, independent oversight and clear privacy protections.
9 September 2026
Xinde Marine News’ Yang Chen writes: Tung Chee-hwa, the first Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and a former Vice Chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, died peacefully on September 8, 2026, at the age of 89. A statement issued by Tung Chee-hwa’s office in the early hours of September 9 confirmed his death, saying that he passed away peacefully with close family ... The post Xinde Marine News: Tung Chee-hwa dies at 89 – from shipping executive to Hong Kong’s first chief executive appeared first on The Loadstar .
9 September 2026
Andrew Frederick’s body was found in property he was staying at in Grenada in January The family of a British father who was found dead in the Caribbean in January is urging authorities in Grenada to work with UK police to uncover the truth about his death. Andrew Frederick’s body was found in the property he was staying at in Grenada on 4 January. An autopsy, performed in the same week by a privately hired pathologist, concluded that the 47-year-old’s death was a homicide.
9 September 2026
South Korea’s H-Line Shipping has returned to dry bulk ordering with two LNG dual-fuel newcastlemaxes at China’s New Times Shipbuilding, backed by long-term employment with steelmaker POSCO. Broker reports seen by Splash put the ships at 210,000 dwt each and roughly $94m apiece, taking H-Line’s investment in the pair to around $188m. Delivery is scheduled …
9 September 2026
Schoeller Holdings has returned to China’s Chengxi Shipyard for another four MR product tankers, doubling its 50,000 dwt series at the CSSC yard just months after completing deliveries of the first batch. Newbuilding sources put the latest quartet at $45m per vessel, giving the deal a combined value of around $180m. The ships are due …
