Advertise with us
DOWNUNDERVOICESAustralia · New Zealand · World
Back to World
World

24 August 2026

Live: One Nation defends migration policy blunder

Downunder Voices Newsroom

Source reporting: abc.net.au

FacebookEmail
Live: One Nation defends migration policy blunder

Barnaby Joyce says One Nation's policy has been 130,000 net migration and has been "all along." Follow live.

About this report

Downunder Voices provides an independently written summary and community perspective based on information published by the original source. The original publisher remains responsible for its reporting.

Join our community

Follow Downunder Voices

Join thousands of readers following news and community stories from Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific.

Follow on FacebookSubmit your story

More from World

View category
Landslide at waste mound in Guinea capital kills 30, government saysWorld

23 August 2026

Landslide at waste mound in Guinea capital kills 30, government says

Dump site in Conakry, which minister had just promised to move, collapsed after heavy rain in west African state A ⁠landslide at a huge waste dump in Guinea’s capital has killed 30 people, the government said on Sunday, after heavy rains overnight prompted it to ⁠collapse, engulfing nearby tents and shacks. The incident occurred less than a week after the government announced plans to close the ⁠site and relocate the waste because of the threat it posed, especially during the rainy season, which causes landslides and fatal flash ⁠floods each year in crowded, underdeveloped cities across parts of West Africa.

Source: The Guardian WorldOriginal source

Read Next

View latest
Canberra’s revolving door is undermining trust in defence procurementSocial Issues

24 August 2026

Canberra’s revolving door is undermining trust in defence procurement

New analysis has exposed a pattern that should alarm anyone who cares about clean government: former defence and public-service insiders are increasingly taking jobs in lobbying or with the defence industry. Four Corners’ examination shows the scale of the revolving door and raises fresh questions about conflicts of interest. Defence procurement is an arena where trust matters. Contracts are big, technical and often opaque. The appearance that former officials leverage inside knowledge and personal contacts to secure lucrative roles for industry partners corrodes public confidence. It also risks skewing decisions toward suppliers with best access rather than best value. This is not about denying people a second career. Public servants will inevitably move between the public and private sectors. The issue is whether current rules and transparency measures are sufficient to manage the risks. When ex-officials accept roles that involve lobbying their former agencies without meaningful cooling‑off periods or clear disclosure, lines blur. A healthy system must balance legitimate mobility with safeguards that prevent undue influence. That means robust, enforceable cooling-off periods; publicly accessible registers that disclose post‑employment roles and the nature of engagements; and tougher oversight of procurement processes so selection is driven by objective criteria and independent scrutiny. Parliamentary committees and integrity bodies have a role to play in tightening rules and enforcing them. The defence sector is rightly subject to national-security sensitivities. But secrecy cannot be a shield for cosy relationships or shadowy influence. The public has a right to expect that decisions affecting taxpayers and national security are made in the national interest, free from the taint of private gain. If the Four Corners analysis is correct about scale, Canberra needs to act. Reforms should be practical, proportionate and aimed at restoring confidence: clearer rules, stronger sanctions for breaches, and transparent reporting. Preserving public trust in defence procurement is not a bureaucratic nicety — it is a democratic necessity.

Community angle

Four Corners finds former officials are taking lucrative roles in lobbying and the defence industry, raising conflict-of-interest concerns over procurement that affects taxpayers and national security.

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/feed/45910/rss.xmlOriginal source
Caring for a young child with disability is pushing parents into poor health and lonelinessSocial Issues

24 August 2026

Caring for a young child with disability is pushing parents into poor health and loneliness

A major Australian study has laid bare what many families already know: parents of young children with disability are paying a heavy personal price. The research finds they are twice as likely to report poor health, and describe feeling constantly in demand and lonely. Those findings should unsettle policymakers. Caring for a child with disability is a long-term, often unpredictable commitment. It can cut across employment, social life and mental wellbeing. When parents’ own health suffers, the whole family’s capacity to function is undermined — including the child who needs consistent support. This is not simply a private problem for a handful of families. It has social and economic consequences. Parents in poor health are less able to work, to engage in community networks, or to navigate complex service systems on behalf of their children. Loneliness and constant demand are risk factors for burnout and for poorer outcomes for both carers and the children they support. The study’s stark finding — parents are twice as likely to say they are in poor health — points to gaps in current supports. Australia needs a coherent response that recognises care work as work. That means better respite options so carers can rest or hold paid jobs; streamlined access to allied health and mental-health supports; and financial measures that recognise the additional costs families face. Early intervention and practical family‑centred services reduce long-term strain and cost better than ad hoc crisis responses. Public conversation about disability services often focuses on the person with a diagnosis, which is right. But policy must also look after the adults who provide daily care. Supporting carers is an investment in children’s futures and in community resilience. Governments, service providers and funders should be judged on whether they reduce the chronic demand and isolation these parents report. If the study is right, the message is clear: caring parents are an at‑risk population and treating their poor health as an incidental side effect is no longer acceptable. A fair social compact recognises the hidden labour of care and backs it with practical, funded support.

Community angle

A major study finds parents of young children with disability are twice as likely to report poor health and describe feeling constantly in demand and lonely, affecting family wellbeing and work capacity.

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/feed/45910/rss.xmlOriginal source